Taking the main points from the feedback would be generally positive, with constructive feedback onto the parts on where I had gone wrong. This would include the fact that I had actually created an outcome which didn't fit the brief criteria, it had to be an envelope. The size was right, It was just that part I'd gone wrong on. Also to make the message of the perforation clearer. These were easy to resolve so I'm taking note of this feedback because It was incredibly helpful that it was picked up on, they were things that had totally flown over me.
I struggled alot with this brief, I think the main part as unlike the other brief I had started to over think and over complicate things, It's not something I often do either and I ended up stalling my self in creating the design. I held back on alot of the designs as I felt they didn't fit the audience or message I was trying to get across which was really direct, and I was trying to make that happen in around about way. It was rather last minute because of this and I feel the outcome reflected that through it's concept, the production of the design pieces however I feel was really good. I was able to find a perforator to complete the perforation part to the design so I was able to go forward with that and It made a great interactive piece.
I much preferred this crit to the previous one, having a extra mind to help out while writing down the feedback allowed us to get alot more done faster and talk about what we thought the messages were, I'd like to do a crit like this again because it's just the right size with two people, anymore and the work load would have been dumped on the odd one out as it all so happens in bigger groups.
No comments:
Post a Comment